An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws
An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws
Blog Article
When the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is generally only completed In case the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. While in the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and the petitioner company responded into the allegations therefore they were very well aware about the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to be appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Article 199 with the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by regulation." It truly is nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
In the event the DIGP finds evidence of the cognizable offense by either party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and proceed according to your law. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
The ruling from the first court created case regulation that must be accompanied by other courts right until or unless possibly new regulation is created, or simply a higher court rules differently.
Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as petitioners might search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Only a few years in the past, searching for case precedent was a hard and time consuming process, demanding persons to search through print copies of case regulation, or to buy access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a bunch of case legislation search options, and a lot of sources offer free access to case regulation.
From the United States, folks are not necessary to hire an attorney to represent them in both civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their individual can remember a person rule of thumb when it involves referring to case legislation or precedent in court documents: be as specific as is possible, leading the court, not only into the case, but towards the section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.
The regulation as established in previous court rulings; like common legislation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's very well-settled that whilst thinking of the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has to consider the benefit of all the eligible candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to these types of suitable candidates that are found to generally be most meritorious among them. Because the petitioner was held to be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded from the respondent department just to increase favor towards the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy about the part in the respondent department.
five hundred,000/- (Rupees 5 hundred thousand only) Just about every along with the same shall be kept inside the police station to the effect that no harm shall be caused on the petitioners. five. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance in the respondents that pensionary benefits could possibly be withheld on account of your allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section 20 of your Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does deliver for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced. These contain if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension might be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established through the government.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability in the matter, but couldn't be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request for the appellate court.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, Additionally it is a properly-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support more info therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.